ImageToExcel.co vs Nanonets: Which Is Better?
Sarah Chen
Updated March 2026 · 8 min read
ImageToExcel.co
8.0
/10- ✓Best-in-class accuracy on phone photos of tables
- ✓Dead simple — upload image, get spreadsheet
- ✓Handles uneven lighting, angles, and partial obstructions
- ✗Image-only input — doesn't process PDFs or digital documents
- ✗Struggles with handwritten content
- ✗No batch processing for large image sets
Starting at $30/mo
Nanonets
8.2
/10- ✓Custom model training
- ✓Strong receipt extraction
- ✓Good API documentation
- ✗Requires training data
- ✗Expensive at $499/mo
- ✗Accuracy drops on new formats
Starting at $499/mo
Quick Verdict
Nanonets scores higher overall (8.2/10 vs 8/10). Choose ImageToExcel.co if you need anyone who photographs printed tables and needs them in excel. Choose Nanonets if you need teams with consistent document formats willing to train models.
Where ImageToExcel.co Wins
- Best-in-class accuracy on phone photos of tables
- Dead simple — upload image, get spreadsheet
- Handles uneven lighting, angles, and partial obstructions
Where Nanonets Wins
- Custom model training
- Strong receipt extraction
- Good API documentation
Feature Comparison
| Feature | ImageToExcel.co | Nanonets |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 |
| Starting Price | $30/mo | $499/mo |
| Accuracy Score | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Ease of Use | 9.5 | 7.8 |
| Integrations | 6.5 | 8.5 |
| Best For | Anyone who photographs printed tables and needs them in Excel | Teams with consistent document formats willing to train models |
Pricing Comparison
ImageToExcel.co starts at $30/mo, while Nanonets starts at $499/mo.